CyberTrust assessed sc.com passively — using only information that is publicly visible on the internet: DNS records, certificates, response headers and reachable services. The result is 80/100, grade B, where A means lowest risk and F means highest, like a school report card.
Email spoofing is blocked: sc.com publishes a DMARC record with p=reject at 100% coverage, so mail forged from @sc.com should be rejected by major providers.
highSPF authorizes huge IP ranges (ip4:40.92.0.0/15, ip4:52.100.0.0/15)
Very large ranges (ip4:40.92.0.0/15, ip4:52.100.0.0/15) let anyone inside them - for example any customer of the same cloud provider - send mail as you.
lowContent Security Policy is weak (no script-src/default-src; object-src not restricted)
The policy is too permissive (no script-src/default-src; object-src not restricted), so injected scripts still run while giving a false sense of security.
Even with HSTS on, the very first visit is still exposed to SSL-stripping: the header only takes effect after one successful HTTPS visit. Browsers ship a preload list (Chromium's list is used by Chrome, Edge, Safari and Firefox) so the first connection goes straight to HTTPS.
Some hostnames of this domain resolve publicly but answer with an HTTP server error instead of a page. Visitors who follow such a link see a gateway error, search engines index the error, and a hostname that resolves but serves nothing is also a takeover waiting to happen once the record is removed.
No BIMI record BIMI shows your logo next to authenticated mail in supporting inboxes (requires an enforcing DMARC policy). It is a trust signal rather than a security control, so it does not affect your score.
No TLS-RPT record TLS-RPT sends you reports when other servers fail to deliver mail to you securely. Recommended alongside MTA-STS.
No Permissions-Policy3 host(s) Permissions-Policy disables powerful browser features (camera, microphone, geolocation) you do not use.
No security.txt2 host(s) security.txt (RFC 9116) tells security researchers how to report vulnerabilities to you instead of posting them publicly.
Website not reachable5 host(s) The site could not be fetched, so its response headers and page content were not checked.
Website returned an error page — partly unassessed2 host(s) The page returned HTTP 503 (often a firewall challenge for automated clients), so most header and content checks could not run. HSTS was still assessed where the response is reliable, but this category is only partially evaluated and its score should be read as incomplete.
No Referrer-Policy Browsers default to strict-origin-when-cross-origin today; setting it explicitly is good hygiene.
HTTPS not available on port 4434 host(s) The TLS checks could not run on this host, so its TLS configuration was not verified.
Frequently asked questions about sc.com security
Does sc.com have DMARC protection against email spoofing?
Yes. sc.com publishes a DMARC record with p=reject at 100% coverage, so receiving providers should reject mail forged from @sc.com.
How is sc.com's B security grade calculated?
CyberTrust scores sc.com passively across 6 area(s) — TLS encryption and certificates 100/100; external attack surface 100/100; reputation and credential exposure 100/100; DNS hygiene 92/100; HTTP security headers 62/100; email spoofing defences (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) 44/100 — and combines them by weight into the overall score of 80/100, which maps to grade B.
What is the most serious issue found on sc.com?
SPF authorizes huge IP ranges (ip4:40.92.0.0/15, ip4:52.100.0.0/15) (severity high). Very large ranges (ip4:40.92.0.0/15, ip4:52.100.0.0/15) let anyone inside them - for example any customer of the same cloud provider - send mail as you. Fixing it is worth about +10 points.
How many subdomains does sc.com expose?
This scan observed 154 publicly resolvable subdomain(s) for sc.com. Verified owners get the full list, with each host's open ports and running services.
What a verified owner of sc.com sees
Everything above is what anyone can observe from the internet. Domain owners who verify
ownership additionally get the full asset inventory — every subdomain with its open ports and
running services — look-alike and typosquatting domains registered against the brand,
credential-exposure monitoring, and copy-paste fixes for each finding.